or Login to submit your own content and comments.
One of the challenges with Twitter is how to sort through the noise (and there is a lot of that) and to decide whether to autofollow those who follow you. If you do the noise level will go up as their tweets are added to your stream, There is just more to sort through.

Now, tools like tweetdeck can help and allow you to group sets of contacts and only see the tweets from them. That functionality set me thinking.


When I look at how most businesses work (summarised in this diagram) we look to our suppliers to provide goods, services, knowledge, and experience to us, and then take those things and use them apply our processes and skills to provide outputs to our clients, so that we meet the needs and they want to pay us.

But doesn't that mean that we may want to follow a different group of people than those who follow us. I want to follow the people who can extend the knowledge that I need to meet my clients needs, but I want to be followed by potential customers so that they can experience my output and see that I could meet their needs.

My competitors may seek to follow me to see what I'm up to, and I may want to follow them for the same reason, sometimes that leads to partnerships that might be unexpected so there's can be inadvertent side effects. One of the ways to get my clients and potential clients to follow me is to rely on them automatically following those who follow them and so my action to follow them leads to my desired outcome.

There are other ways though, suppose I follow people they follow and engage in the conversations they are finding interesting, I then become visible, and when you are visible and interesting, you get followed.

So, I've started following businesses that meet my supply needs, to listen to them, to learn, to source new suppliers, and resources. They may follow me back, I'm not worried whether they do or they don't.

I'm actively seeking followers who could be clients, and I'm not necessarily relying on them using autofollow to get their attention.

Twitter is great for random conversations, but within those random conversations you can choose to have a strategy to get the outcomes you need.

That's my current way of working, but what, if you use twitter, are you doing?

ps. If you liked this article and you do use Twitter please also twitter it here --> Twitter this post

[ < Previous ] [ Next > ]
[ William Buist's blog ] [ 5 comments ] [ comment likes (3) ] [ More Like this ] [ # ] [ report spam ]
or Login to submit your own content and comments.
view this person's profile

Twitter - Do you autofollow

Likes (0) by Dr Bruce Hoag CPsychol AFBPsSVerified SafeNetworking [20.69:826] on 11-Mar-09 6:35am : Reply
I don't autofollow anyone. I carefully choose the people I follow because I want to read what they write. I can't understand the value in following thousands or tens of thousands of people except for perhaps the exposure your posts might give to search engines. Even if that's the case, no search engine, to my knowledge, ever benefited from my wisdom.

Cheers, Bruce


Dr Bruce Hoag
Organizational Psychologist
Expert Ezine Articles Author

Contra San Faustino, 23
36100 Vicenza
Italy
(39) 339 378 1797
------------------------------------------------------
www.p-advantage.com/Blog.html
www.abcnetwork.biz/managementguru
www.linkedin.com/in/bhoag1
http://twitter.com/management_guru
------------------------------------------------------
What will the workplace look like after the recession? Read "It's Work, But Not as We Know It." To subscribe, visit Two Sides of the Same Coin, my FREE monthly newsletter! http://www.p-advantage.com/Newsletter.php available now.available now.
view this person's profile

Not . . .

Likes (0) by Andreas WiedowBlackStarVerified SafeNetworking [58.22:14] on 11-Mar-09 7:40am : Reply
. . . Yet.

1st: I don't know how - anyone in the know and able to explain for dummies ?

2nd: There's the Obama approach . . . followers 360,000 / following 360,000 . . . more or less. BUT . . . he's not reading it. It's a kind gesture, a nice acknowledgement in my book.

Others who have something to say are being followed by 20,000, 40,000 or 60,000, themselves are following only a few, let's say 30, 50 or 100. Who they find worthwhile and inspiring.

3rd: In the beginning it might make sense to accumulate something like a critical mass and being recognized by a certain audience.

4th: I randomly chose to follow tweets I've picked from authorities. To get a picture. Later - and that is a general option - I can delete/block them anyways if they turn out to be rather twits than tweets.

So show me the way and I'm willing to give it a try . . . the auto-follow.

But . . . make it dummy-save !

Tune in . . . Achtung Baby by U2 . . . smile

Have fun, Andreas Wiedow - aka Durian
+49-69-70720880 | Newsflash abonnieren | Übersicht aller Telefon-Tipps
view this person's profile

Go to tweetlater...

Likes (0) by William BuistBlackStarVerified SafeNetworking [99.66:2] on 11-Mar-09 8:20am : Reply

M: 07880 794127 T: 01291 622598
E: wmb@abelard-uk.com
W : www.abelard-uk.com
B: The Societal Web
here>> and once you have registered account follow the links for 'Automation'
Comment removed
view this person's profile

Twitter - Do you autofollow

Likes (0) by Milton RodriguesPowerNetworkerVerified SafeNetworking [17.71:1266] on 11-Mar-09 4:12pm : Reply

INFO-OVERLOAD ! smile