|
or Login to submit your own content and comments.
Articles : Three elements of communication - and the so called "7%-38%-55% Rule"
You've probably come across this 'rule' on a communication seminar or course somewhere. I've heard it repeated many, many times. More recently I learned that it is commonly quoted OUT OF CONTEXT such that wrong conclusions are drawn and taught. I thought it would be helpful to share the related clarification more widely.
The original research to which everyone refers was undertaken in 1971 by Albert Mehrabian (currently Professor Emeritus of Psychology, UCLA). Mehrabian reached two conclusions: 1 - There are basically three elements in any face-to-face communication: • words • tone of voice and • body language. 2 - These three elements account differently for the meaning of the message: - Words account for 7% - Tone of voice accounts for 38% and - Body language accounts for 55% of the message. It seems that many people who quote Mehrabian's research seem unaware that this second conclusion was NOT a general observation relevant to all communications. Mehrabian reached this second conclusion in the context of experiments dealing with communications of feelings and attitudes (i.e., like-dislike). Thus the often quoted disproportionate influence of tone of voice and body language is only really true when someone says they like/dislike something/someone but their tone of voice or body language implies the opposite. Commonly this will mean that two or more of the three elements are ambiguous. Such ambiguity appears mostly when the words spoken are inconsistent with the tone of voice or body language of the speaker. This would be the case for example when someone says "I do not have a problem with you!" whilst at the same time their closed body language says the opposite and they avoid eye-contact and sound anxious. In such situations Mehrabian's research showed that the receiver of the communication will accept the predominant form of communication, the non-verbal (38% + 55%), rather than the literal meaning of the words (7%). Let's face it - that conclusion IN CONTEXT is not really a surprise is it? On his website Mehrabian specifically states: "Please note that this and other equations regarding relative importance of verbal and nonverbal messages were derived from experiments dealing with communications of feelings and attitudes (i.e., like-dislike). Unless a communicator is talking about their feelings or attitudes, these equations are not applicable." My view, despite this clarification, is that it's important to be congruent when we communicate. That is, our body language and tone of voice should be consistent with the words we use. Otherwise we can confuse people and reduce the prospect of getting our message across so that it is understood. We have to take responsibility ourselves for any failure to communicate effectively. It's OUR fault and not the fault of our listeners. The words we choose to use ARE generally more important than is often assumed. Certainly, when making a presentation we need to pay just as much attention to the words we say as we do to the way in which we will present them - how we will move and the variations in our tone of voice. This is good news as most people will spend far more time working out WHAT they are going to say. than rehearsing HOW they are going to say it and HOW they will move when they are talking. Perhaps one reason why Mehrabian's research is quoted so often though is that body language and tone of voice are evidently important aspects of communication. And in the absence of any other validated research we have to quote Mehrabian to make the point - even if we do so out of context. Such quotes are generally effective though - maybe because of the tone of voice the speaker uses and their body language when they tell us about the "7%-38%-55% Rule". Mark Lee FCA CTA (Fellow) Chairman: The Tax Advice Network for tax problems too big for most accountants. NB: I'm just the conduit! My blogs: (1) For ambitious professionals (2) Accountant jokes and fun (3) Debunking tax stories in the news (4) If you want Referrals From Accountants My personal website: BookMarkLee for details of how to engage me for writing or speaking gigs [ < Previous ] [ Next > ] [ Mark Lee's blog ] [ 15 comments ] [ More Like this ] [ # ] [ report spam ] or Login to submit your own content and comments.
Three elements of communication - and the so called "7%-38%-55%Likes (0)Great article. I've been debating that rule with people for years, and you have summarised its specificity well. It does have value, but it is so widely mis-used and misquoted, particuarly by devotees of NLP, that it has become devalued. Well done. Best wishes Alan Alan Stevens, Author of The Pocket Media Coach. Click here for The Mediacoach Podcast Director, MediaCoach Training and Coaching for Media Skills, Presentations and Public Speaking. Specialists in Crisis Management. Tel/Fax +44 (0) 20 8220 6919 Mobile : 07986 852621 Three elements of communication - and the so called "7%-38%-55%Likes (0)Roy Law Systems Studio - 07831 340507 - roy@systemsstudio.com - "... more than management accounting reports" ![]() As to your concerns about visualisation, I have found that some people like to be taught to create a screen-sized "image" of the caller on a convenient wall. Roy Law Systems Studio - 07831 340507 - roy@systemsstudio.com - "... more than management accounting reports" ![]() Three elements of communication - and the so called "7%-38%-55%Likes (0)How do you communicate with people who are very different from yourself? You are aware of the problem? == ... doesn't work for me. I normally frown, utter several expletives, pick up the handset and in my gruffest voice say "Yes? What do you want this time? I haven't got all day!" Works a treat with telemarketers. Admittedly it's not so good when it's my daughter wanting a lift from school. Derek ![]() website not working? Smiling before picking up the phone ...Likes (0)@ "Yes? What do you want this time? I haven't got all day!" The wording isn't that bad and very provocative. In case a new customer calls it could lead to you be taken even more serious. Just one suggested tweak: "Yes? What do you want this time? I haven't got all day ?" You spot the difference ? . . . *schmunzelgrins* . . . Yes, it's about your voice comin' across. It's nice to be important (I haven't got all day). It's more important to be nice (?). Warm regards, Andreas Wiedow Three elements of communication - and the so called "7%-38%-55%Likes (0)There's some previous discussion of this here on Ecademy at http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=70030, and my coauthor wrote about it on our blog (ended up in our book) here. Scott Allen Linked Intelligence - The smart source for all things LinkedIn Coauthor, The Virtual Handshake: Opening Doors and Closing Deals Online Three elements of communication - and the so called "7%-38%-55%Likes (0)Of course some INTP's might warrant special treatment ... Roy Law Systems Studio - 07831 340507 - roy@systemsstudio.com - "... more than management accounting reports" ![]() Three elements of communication - and the so called "7%-38%-55%Likes (0)Anthony's post in July and your own blog provide even more background than I traced. Interesting to see further details of Mehrabian's research. Makes it even more obvious that the 'rule' does not justify anything like the reliance that is placed on it. Cheers Mark Three elements of communication - and how Mehrabian translatesLikes (0)Taking simply, that would suggest that the 7% literal words is worth 100% online as tone of voice and body language are not involved here. Or are they??? Thanks Stephen Follow @Stephen_Bailey Three elements of communication - and the so called "7%-38%-55%Likes (0)This can explain why sometimes after you leave an interaction we 'feel' different about the communication and not sure why. As you quote, it is "important to be congruent when we communicate" Some of this comes down to our own self-awareness and what we think we are communicating and we actually are. Baiju Baiju Solanki Performance Coach baiju@baijusolanki.com www.baijusolanki.com 07968 533918 ![]() By TwitterButtons.com Three elements of communication - and the so called "7%-38%-55%Likes (0)It's probably best remembered and applied as another example of the Pareto Principle (or 80/20 rule): 80% Body language and voice tone 20% Actual words used Roy LawSystems Studio - 07831 340507 - Roy@SystemsStudio.com - "... more than management accounting reports & proofreading" Three elements of communication - and the so called "7%-38%-55%Likes (0)My view is that it depends on the situation. I think that words are often well more than half the message, but there's no need to put numbers on it. I agree with Mark about congruence too. Alas, the old 7% words nonsense has found it's way into many textbooks, which makes people believe it must be true. Best wishes Alan Alan Stevens, President, Global Speakers Federation, 2010-2011 Communication, PR and Reputation Management Author of Ping! Presenter of Media Coach Radio Show Follow me on Twitter Videos - Ecademy London and Your Business Channel |
Join Now
Blog Statistics
- Posted: 29-Dec-06
- Last action: 24-Jun-11
- Views: 34242
- Likes: 6
- Comments: 15
What is Mark doing?
Status: BookMarkLee: @PharosLegal Thanks Natalie. Good memory. That was 2001 wasn't it? I'm gearing up for @misskymhall having now found her on Linkedin. #Wary [ 8:04am ]
See all >
Ecademy.TV
MarketplaceSocial Media Made Simple - Avoid Social Not quite sure what you are doing with Social Media? ... read more |
BlackStar MarketBusiness Coaching Newcastle - Business Protostar Leadership Development_Ltd Business Coaching Training... read more |




Roy Law
Posted a new entry on :
Message

Ecademy
10-40-50 Mehrabian's Law ...
Likes (0)Thanks for giving us the detailed background; I particularly liked your "important to be congruent when we communicate" which, suitably rephrased, might well get immortalised as Lee's Law of Communications
One small aspect that I emphasise is the importance of congruence between the eyes and the mouth when we smile - "smile with your eyes". This is such a simple task for audience participation and leaves everyone feeling great!
Roy Law
Systems Studio - 07831 340507 - roy@systemsstudio.com
- "... more than management accounting reports"